Repeal of New Immigration Law in Alabama

State Senator Beasley from Alabama has introduced legislation to repeal the newly enacted laws against illegal immigrants.  He claims most representatives did not understand the negative effects that the law would have on citizens of Alabama.

MONTGOMERY -- Alabama Sen. Billy Beasley has filed a bill to repeal Alabama's sweeping immigration law, saying it is causing severe workforce shortages and problems in state courthouses and schools.
"The people in the agriculture community are not happy with it because they can't get workers. The folks in the courthouses are not happy with it. The folks in the school business are not happy with it," said the Democrat from Clayton.
Beasley said three other Democrats have signed on as co-sponsors of the proposed repeal, and he hopes more legislators will support the measure.
"I think there is a large contingent of folks who didn't realize what it was going to do," Beasley said.
However, Sen. Scott Beason, who sponsored the immigration law in the Senate, said he will fight attempts to undo or weaken the law.
"I can't imagine that anyone would want to repeal the bill," said Beason, R-Gardendale.
Beasley voted against the bill when it was before Alabama lawmakers. He said the new law has caused a "world of fear" for people in the Hispanic community.
"It's kind of a mean-spirited law," Beasley said.
Beasley said the law has caused workforce shortages in many industries, as legal and illegal immigrants leave the state. He said it also is causing long lines at courthouse and is putting an unfunded mandate on county jails to hold suspected illegal immigrants.
The Clayton senator said he also was doubtful the law would open up jobs for Alabamians because many people don't want the labor-intensive jobs the immigrants are performing.
But Beason said he believes the law is working.
"It's doing what it is supposed to be doing overall," Beason said.
He said the immigration law appeared to be moving an illegal workforce out of the state, and an adjustment period is to be expected. He pointed out the law has been in effect only six days.
He said he believes getting rid of illegal workers will create jobs for Alabamians. "Apparently a lot of people were working an illegal workforce," Beason said.

Read more from this source: 

http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2011/10/state_sen_billy_beasley_files.html

New Alabama Law: Crops rot in the field

Nueva ley de inmigración de Alabama.  Es el más severa de los EEUU.  Los partidarios dicen que la norma debe producir más trabajo para los ciudadanos mientras que las voces criticas aseguran que saca los derechos civiles. Pero la cosecha se pudre en los campos y los agricultores no pueden encontrar trabajadores suficientes para cosechar, porque la mayoría de los trabajadores - legales y sin papeles - han salido los trabajos y han huido.  Tambien, los administradores de cárceles se preocupan que no tienen espacio ni capacidad para detener más personas.

New immigration law in Alabama.  It's the most severe in the US.  Supporters say that the rule should produce more work for citizens while critics claim that it robs some of civil rights.  But food is rotting in the fields and farmers are unable to find sufficient workers to harvest their crops, since most of the workers have left their jobs and departed from the area.  Jail administrators are also concerned since they don't have the capacity to hold detainees.

Immigration Experiment Under the Microscope: Very Costly, Unintended Consequences

Another community reports that its effort to rid itself of immigrants, ends up costing dearly.  For some the goal is to GET RID OF both legal and undocumented immigrants.  (It's pretty easy to call this Racism.)  For others it is an unintended consequence.  Either way, the community pays, both financially and through lost enrichment of life.

“The Hispanic businesses and malls are empty. You used to see 100 people at the shopping center, and after the resolution, you'd see five. You noticed the difference."

This quote describes the fallout from Prince William County’s polarizing local immigration law which was passed in 2007 and modified in 2008. A three-year, $385,000 University of Virginia study of the policy released this week found that it drove out a significant number of immigrants—both legal and undocumented.
Under the original policy, local police were directed to check the immigration status of any individual they had probable cause to believe was in the country without authorization. After much controversy, Prince William limited the measure in 2008 to require police officers to check the immigration status of all arrestees.
Clearly, Prince William’s immigration actions cost the county the contributions of thousands of immigrant taxpayers, workers and consumers. From 2006 to 2008, Prince William’s non-citizen Hispanic population dropped by 22 percent, or by 7,700 people. During the same period, the undocumented population decreased by an estimated 3,000 to 6,000 people.
Immigration hawks are quick to separate legal from undocumented immigrants; we’re told harsh laws aren’t anti-immigrant because they only target undocumented immigrants. The UVA study shows us that this is a naïve assumption. Too often, restrictive immigration enforcement and the corresponding policy debates also impact legal immigrants and the broader Hispanic community.

Whether UVA’s findings are indicators of the policy’s success or troubling evidence of collateral damage depends on who you ask. For county supervisors, driving out legal immigrants and Hispanics was never a goal of the measure, but an “unintended consequence.” For others, this was a victory. From the report:

Some actors in the drama of the resolution’s passage had quite different goals. Some in the community who advocated the policy made clear…that they were hoping to “take back the County” by reversing the tide of rapid in-migration of Hispanics to Prince William County.

Immigration restrictionists also counted this as a win for “attrition through enforcement,” a strategy that calls for crafting harsh laws to make life so untenable for undocumented immigrants they choose to leave—an approach best described as “a product of delusion and cruelty.”

Should other localities follow Prince William’s approach to immigration enforcement? The authors conclude that their results should be only applied to other jurisdictions with “great caution.” ..... Moreover, these less-than-stellar results cost Prince William almost $3 million to implement. One author of the study advises would-be copycats: “This not a free policy…Don’t try this if you don’t want to spend some money.”

See more of this article:  http://www.dmiblog.com/archives/2010/11/under_the_microscope_one_count.html

Arizona Anti-immigrant Law Backfires. Mexicans Welcome Back

Arizona's anti-immigration law is causing tremendous economic hardships on Arizona's businesses and citizens.  In a radical change of heart, many are calling for a new worker visa program in order to bring mexican workers back to Arizona.

Selective Deportation of Illegal Immigrants: Obama's new approach to inmigrantes.

By Christopher Goffard, Paloma Esquivel and Teresa Watanabe,
 Los Angeles Times
August 19, 2011

The Obama administration said it will review the cases of 300,000 illegal immigrants currently in deportation proceedings to identify "low-priority" offenders — including the elderly, crime victims and people who have lived in the U.S. since childhood — with an eye toward allowing them to stay.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced the review as the Obama administration has sought to counter criticism that it has been too harsh in its deportation policies. By launching the case-by-case review, officials said they are refocusing deportation efforts on convicted felons and other "public safety threats."

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/19/local/la-me-0819-obama-immigration-20110819

Telling the New American Dreamers - "Go Elsewhere !"

By JENNIFER EPSTEIN | 6/15/11 8:02 AM EDT Updated: 6/15/11 4:18 PM EDT

In a major speech to the Council on Foreign Relations on Wednesday, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg says the United States risks “national suicide” if it doesn’t adopt a more welcoming immigration policy.

“We will not remain a global superpower if we continue to close our doors to people who want to come here to work hard, start businesses, and pursue the American dream,” Bloomberg said.

 "The American dream cannot survive if we keep telling the dreamers to go elsewhere,” the mayor adds. “It’s what I call national suicide – and that’s not hyperbole.”

Immigration reform, he argues, is the key to creating new jobs and setting the economy on a steady path into the future.
Bloomberg’s speech comes as the Partnership for a New American Economy, of which he is a co-chair, releases a report looking at the role that immigrants play at Fortune 500 companies and the potential. Forty percent of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or the children of immigrants, the report notes.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57013.html#ixzz1UVNClVIv

Immigration policy affects individuals not just numbers.

How are these people affected by our immigration policies?

Reduction in Immigration from Mexico - It's the economy, stupid!

According to BBC Mundo reporter Alberto Nájar, fewer undocumented Mexicans are coming to the US.  There appears to be several reasons for this phenomenon which began 3 years ago:

1. The economy in Mexico is improving slightly, providing more opportunity without emigrating.
2. The economy in the US has been in crisis, leaving less opportunity here: fewer jobs and lower wages.
3. Emigrants must run the gauntlet of narco thugs just to reach their northern border.
4. Border surveillance has increased.
5. Anti-immigrant laws have increased in many regions of the US.  The local climate is much less friendly after arrival in many states.

The result is having effects in communities in Mexico.

See the following article in BBC Mundo:

El "sueño americano" atrae a menos mexicanos

Alberto Nájar

BBC Mundo, Ciudad de México

La vigilancia en la frontera sur de Estados Unidos influye en la caída migratoria

Hace unos meses las autoridades de Michoacán, en el oeste de México, notaron un súbito aumento en los estudiantes matriculados en las escuelas. También subieron las solicitudes a sus programas sociales, y después hubo informes de que las fiestas en algunos pueblos fueron más concurridas de lo normal.

En los tres hechos hay un común denominador: bajó la migración de mexicanos hacia Estados Unidos.

De hecho, en el último censo de población el gubernamental Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Geografía (Inegi), detectó más personas de las esperadas pues muchos que pensaban emigrar decidieron quedarse.

El fenómeno empieza a cambiar la vida en muchas comunidades de México, especialmente las que dependen de remesas o tienen problemas de marginación. Michoacán, uno de los estados con mayor flujo migratorio del país, es un ejemplo.
El cambio demográfico genera aprietos económicos al gobierno local, porque no alcanza el presupuesto para atender a las familias que se quedaron sin remesas, volvieron de Estados Unidos o fueron deportados.
"Hay más demanda. Tenemos miles de personas más en el estado y todos necesitan un empleo, comer, generar recursos", le dice a BBC Mundo Zaida Mandujano, secretaria del Migrante de Michoacán.

Remesas sistémicas

"El problema ya no es sólo cruzar el desierto sino de que te asalten y te maten antes de llegar a la frontera"

Jorge Durand, especialista en migración, Universidad de Guadalajara

¿Por qué bajó la migración a Estados Unidos?
Hay varias respuestas, dice Jorge Durand, académico de la Universidad de Guadalajara y uno de los pioneros en la investigación del fenómeno en México.
La primera es la crisis económica estadounidense que afectó sobre todo a las áreas donde trabaja la mayoría de los indocumentados mexicanos, es decir, la construcción y servicios.
Otra respuesta es el clima de inseguridad en México por la guerra contra y entre carteles, que hace más peligroso el viaje.
"El problema ya no es sólo cruzar el desierto sino de que te asalten y te maten antes de llegar a la frontera", explica Durand a BBC Mundo. "El riesgo que había en años anteriores se multiplicó por diez".
Una explicación más es que quienes financiaban la migración indocumentada ya no pueden hacerlo.
En el último siglo los mexicanos establecieron una extensa red de familiares y amigos que les acogían y ayudaban a conseguir empleo, además de prestar dinero para cubrir la cuota de los "coyotes", como se llama a los traficantes de humanos.
El mecanismo, conocido como "remesa sistémica", dejó de funcionar hace tres años.
"El que está allá o no tiene trabajo, o vive una situación precaria en su empleo. La mayoría no tiene dinero para prestar a los familiares", explica Durand.

Cambios

El flujo migratorio también bajó por el clima anti inmigrante en varias regiones de Estados Unidos, sobre todo en donde los congresos locales autorizaron nuevas más leyes más restrictivas contra los indocumentados, y también porque aumentó la vigilancia en la frontera sur de ese país.
Todos estos factores hacen más cara la decisión de emigrar, pues contrario a otros años ahora la ganancia es menor. Hace una década la diferencia salarial entre México y Estados Unidos era de 8 a 1 pero se redujo a la mitad, afirma Durand. Otros expertos coinciden en que la situación socioeconómica de muchas comunidades mexicanas ha mejorado en la última década.

Zaida Mandujano, secretaria del Migrante de Michoacán, reconoce el impacto que la caída de la migración tiene en sus comunidades.

Así, muchos mexicanos piensan dos veces antes de salir del país lo cual complica la situación de las comunidades de origen, cuenta Zaida Mandujano.
En muchos municipios aún sigue la pobreza que impulsó a la migración, algo que no cambiará en el corto plazo según han reconocido las autoridades.
"En los últimos tres años ha habido cambios radicales, y los gobiernos deben adaptarse a la realidad del fenómeno", reconoce la secretaria del Migrante.

Joroba migratoria

Según Durand la caída en la migración es un fenómeno temporal, pues en la medida que mejore la economía estadounidense habrá más oportunidades de empleo para los indocumentados.
Pero es difícil volver a las cifras que hubo en la década pasada, cuando emigró un promedio de 500.000 mexicanos cada año.
Ahora el flujo anual de indocumentados es menor a 300.000 personas, según datos oficiales.
Esto no significa que el fenómeno se detenga en el corto plazo, sobre todo porque la economía mexicana no crece al ritmo necesario.
A este proceso los especialistas le llaman "joroba migratoria", es decir, durante varios años el flujo se mantiene en crecimiento, pero después empieza a bajar. Algo que ya ocurre en México, según los especialistas.